Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: 26 in-kind benefits (e.g., use of car) from these organiza- tions. Cplt. 100 71} But a8 the Seventh Circuit held "it is not rcasonable to infer that the purpose the Ipetitioners alleged conduet] raise funds" simply be- cause that conduct incidentally donations t support Petitioners also argue that the negative economic effect or abortion businesses allegedly resulting from respond- ents activities satisfies the cconomic purpose requirement. Pet B This contention 15 patently meritl less, as "renders the distinction betwcen 'purpose and 'effect' terly meaningless. Bray Alexandria omen' Heafth Clinic 113 753 (1993) The fact that an organization donor --supported, or that it pays its employees or agents, simply has no con nection at the legality of its activitics or its liability under RICO Th ...
(.png)
